Open Minds

Have you watched the latest Brooksville City Council meeting online? The most amazing and rare thing happened: an elected official gathered information and changed his mind after listening to the people of the community! It was so wonderful and refreshing to see City Council Member David Bailey explain how he filled out the annual review for City Manager Mark Kutney based on his personal experience, which had personally been good. However, after filing out the review, he talked to local businesses and residents around town and got a very different picture of how the City is being run. And he heard enough negatives all around that he went so far as to recommend termination of the City Manager’s contract during the meeting. Mr. Bailey is truly someone who understands what his role is as a city council member and takes it seriously. We find it quite refreshing to have a council member with a conscience and the willingness to back up his constituents.

Likewise, after seconding the motion to not renew the City Manager’s contract, Council Member Blake Bell talked about how many negative stories he heard regarding the management of the City, including from someone who wanted to open a business in Brooksville, but refused to open it within the City limits due to hearing how difficult the City is to work with. He also said he had spoken to people with businesses in multiple towns, and all expressed their frustration with Brooksville’s lack of support and help compared to other communities. As he talked, Council Member Bell demonstrated that he put the work into making his conclusions and not just went through the motions and made decisions from his own personal bubble. We definitely need more proactive council members in Brooksville, but it looks like we are on our way to a better future with Council Members Bailey and Bell. 

In a more perfect world, this would be a teaching moment for some of our other city council members who appeared to have made their decisions not based on community input, since they are so rarely seen at local events and meeting local business people, but on their own decades of serving on Council. (Yes, we have been recycling many of the same council members for decades, during a time Brooksville failed to thrive, so it’s no surprise that there are so few new ideas, nor even support for new ideas.) Council Member Battista went so far as to chastise Council Members Bailey and Bell as newbies who didn’t understand that there could, and have been, worse, and even corrupt, City Managers, which is apparently how he sets his standards for the job. And he claimed that the naysayers were just upset that they didn’t have “side door” access to the City Manager as they had in the past. Had he talked to local residents and business people, he might find that the actual complaint is that many don’t even have front door access, requiring multiple attempts to even get an appointment or phone call with the City Manager. Heck, even getting an acknowledgement response to an email is next to impossible from the City Manager for those who are not council members. And if they finally do get to speak to Mr. Kutney, they often leave feeling unheard and unsatisfied.

We urge the three other city council members to try to think back to when they were first elected and eager to support the community they live in. Get out, talk to residents and business owners and get an outside of City Hall perspective on how the City is responding to its citizen’s needs. Perhaps we are wrong and they will only hear happy stories of people content with the state of the community. Or perhaps they will hear the tales of frustration that both Council Members Bailey and Bell heard and remember to have an open mind about what is needed. Either way, they will have a better feel for the pulse of the city that they claim to care about. 

The Meeting can be seen at: Feb 01, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting - Brooksville, FL ( and the discussion about renewing the City Manager’s contract starts around 3:17

If the city doesn’t support its community the community will not survive

Try as we might, it’s taking some effort to get used to “attending” City Council’s virtual “Zoom” meetings, right? While I was uncomfortable at first, I’m beginning to discover some advantages. For one, you can really see facial expressions. From disdain, disagreement, and discomfort to occasional relaxed smiles, which unfortunately are few, Council meetings have become a study in human expression. Much is communicated when they’re so up close.

It seems the topic most uncomfortable for them is Brooksville Main Street, mostly when Ms. Erhard brings it up, which manages to happen even when BMS is not on the City Council agenda. Whether it’s about dollars, certain individuals, events, economic development, banners, tip jars, bank accounts, road closures, insurance, etc., etc., she brings up Brooksville Main Street.

Meanwhile, the other members, in varying degrees, seem to appreciate that BMS is becoming a force for positive change in the city. They might be having pertinent and appropriate discussions about city concerns including about BMS, but always, no matter how appropriate and reasoned the discussion may be, it invariably gets muddled when Ms. Erhard’s predictably sarcastic voice breaks in to say something completely out of context about BMS.

Again, we ask, why is she so completely focused on destroying the best thing that’s come along for the city’s business and residential communities in years? At a recent Council meeting, dozens of letters supporting BMS were read into the record. Ms. Erhard’s reaction was to “blame” it on BMS rather than recognize that the Community wants to be heard. You’ll see BMS smiling every time it happens. (Thanks, by the way, to those who voiced their thoughts so strongly and clearly. Hopefully, Council Members are listening.)

One thought she keeps harping on which may be incorrectly resonating a bit among the other members is this: to her, funding grants to BMS are some sort of charitable largesse which should end at some point when BMS becomes “self-sustaining.” Let’s be clear about this, Brooksville Main Street is not a business looking for a profit to sustain itself. It is a NON-PROFIT organization run by Executive Director Natalie Kahler, Marketing and Events Coordinator Tina Marie Polson, and a large group of volunteers who receive neither pay nor profit from their involvement. Their clearly defined program is to do all they can to help the Brooksville downtown become a viable and thriving economic center while preserving and enhancing its unique natural and historical charm. To do this, they follow a national blueprint successfully implemented by hundreds of cities nationwide.

Based on the concept that buy-in breeds success, that blueprint urges local programs to seek funding from local governments, the private sector, and from the organization’s own efforts at fundraising events and activities, each contributing about a third of the cost of the program. It is not designed to be self-sustaining. The city’s contributions to Main Street are to help the community. If the city doesn’t support its community, the community will not survive economically. And it’s not all about financial backing. What Brooksville Main Street is trying so hard to do is to PARTNER with the City. The financial aspect, while important for reasons discussed in past posts, is only one part of what Main Street is asking for from the City. What It really wants is to move forward with projects in cooperation with the City to everyone’s benefit, whether it be events, supporting redevelopment efforts, or downtown improvements, small and large. What Brooksville Main Street really needs from the City is a “we like your ideas and enthusiasm and want to help” attitude rather than the antagonistic relationship that Ms. Erhard seems intent on fostering.

And this needs to be said: The things that Main Street does are done for the community, not city government. But since many of its activities are those the city perhaps would like to be doing but aren’t able to for various reasons, when BMS does them, it’s a favor to the City as much as it is to the community. Things like promoting the city’s businesses and building a sense of community among the businesses and residents lifts everyone up and should be welcomed by the city rather than questioned at every turn. Buy-in gives everyone ownership in the hard work of success, livability, economic viability, and just plain joy of being a part of it all.

And here’s a very pertinent point: when BMS is out there getting it done, it’s doing it for a lot less money than what it would cost the city. The success of Main Street is measured by the hard work of two paid employees and 189 unpaid volunteers who contribute thousands of hours of personal time freely given. These are volunteers who offer an amazing variety of professional skills including architects, engineers, accountants, attorneys, artists, musicians, marketing personnel and more. This is what the city gets for the $45,000 of support funding BMS has requested. Compare this amount to the cost they’re estimating to get their own economic development program up and running now at a minimum of $131,000 and the questions regarding the value of funding for BMS becomes even more confusing.  Imagine how much further a city economic development arm could go with BMS by its side rather than starting from scratch. And you can't tell me that those volunteers who so regularly support BMS would be eager to volunteer for a city run economic development program. It’s just not how government programs work. But it is how public/ private partnerships work and how it should work between the City and BMS.

But wait, last week City Council voted to cut the amount it will budget for Main Street next year to half the amount requested to $22,500. What does that mean? It means, Brooksville Main Street will have to decide what it can still afford to do, and not do, on behalf of the community.

But you know what? The money’s important, of course. Critical, in fact. The really unfortunate thing, however, is that it seems to keep the city and BMS from forming an alliance that will truly benefit the community. It appears that some just cannot grasp what BMS is all about and the important role it can play for the city as a whole. It isn’t a pipedream. It’s a proven program. But maybe that tunnel has a light. All the candidates running in the coming election for City Council have indicated their support for Brooksville Main Street. So, will the city’s reluctance to join BMS in its work for the community be changing in a few months?  Let’s keep our hopes up.

In any scenario that may be coming forward, be assured, BMS looks forward to partnering with the City to help keep its costs as low as possible. As willing and supportive partners, so much more that needs to be done, can be done, and will be done for the great community of Brooksville.

Stay tuned …

The Voice of Brooksville Main Street

City Council Dumps Funding Support for Brooksville Main Street

The members of the Brooksville City Council are not all that different from most other small towns the size of Brooksville, one would think. But after watching how some council members continue to disparage what Brooksville Main Street has done for the city and what the city itself has not is … the word escapes me … “baffling” will have to do. It is clear, as a body they are out to destroy the only good thing the city has had going for it in terms of Economic Development in decades. City Council has now voted to remove all funding for Main Street Brooksville from the city’s 2021 proposed budget.

But as individual members, this position, thank goodness, was not unanimous. Members positions were as follows:

The Forced Vote

When city staff accidentally left Brooksville Main Street’s Executive Director’s report they'd requested off the agenda and a motion with a second was on the table, the discussion that took place was on the motion and not about the agenda item. Erhard had made the motion before any discussion had begun then

Later, before the discussion was complete, Battista “called the question.” This forced a vote before further in formation Main Street might have offered as well as any Florida Main Street’s State Coordinator, Katherine Beck, who was available by telephone from Tallahassee, may have offered. Even the Mayor was prevented from sharing his opinion before the vote. Thus, despite anything the Mayor might have done, the discussion was then limited to the motion and not the overall information about operating the Main Street program that could and should have been available to the Council members before the vote. Had there been further debate, the information that would have been forthcoming might have resulted in a different outcome. Hopefully, what happened can be changed as discussed below.

The Nonsense of it All

Those who want to get rid of Brooksville Main Street seem to have no idea that abandoning the program is clearly not in the city’s best interests. I believe they know all the good things people are saying about what Main Street has accomplished. Yet some council members cannot stop their personal knowledge deficits and biases from blinding them to what the city needs and the opportunity that stands in front of them. They either cannot see or consciously choose to deny that Main Street is building real community belief in the city, hope for its future and, most importantly, that it’s achievable. What they seemingly pay attention to instead are continuous, unfounded, sometimes unrelated, rumors and incorrect or insignificant negative things about the program. This information is apparently provided to them by only a handful of individuals whose legacy has been negativity and destruction of plans to help Brooksville and who have never presented an alternate plan but simply been against anyone else’s.

The Message it Sends

The question you likely have is, why does it have to be this way? And so do I. But that’s perhaps for a future post. Just know that, as a body, they have bugled to all current and even prospective city businesses, property owners and residents, that they do not give a flip about what Brooksville Main Street is trying to do for the city and will not support it in the city’s 2021 budget in any form, period.

So, what’s going to happen to Brooksville Main Street? What’s the city going to do about Economic Development if Main Street can’t survive without the requested $45,000? Will the momentum Main Street has built - vis a vis the hard work and growing support from city businesses, property owners, and residents, and the increasing number of visitors to the city - be lost? As a start, know this: We’re not going away. I refer you to an insightful and thoughtfully written letter by Brooksville Main Street’s Executive Director, Natalie Kahler, the morning after the city washed its hands of the program. Read it at this link:

The City’s Short Term (?) Plan

Earlier in the meeting, City Manager, Mark Kutney had presented the Council a “strategic plan” for an Economic Development Office for the city which included the potential for two new staff positions and a sweeping set of new responsibilities for them and the rest of the city’s existing staff. A careful read indicates it’s simply an attempt to duplicate much of what Main Street is already doing. The Council told him to consider only one of the positions and charged him with adding further details including a better handle on what it all would cost.

Incredibly, Council Member Erhard said she supports the plan and is ready to implement it even before knowing the estimated final costs or how long it would take. Based on what was presented, even a very conservative guess might put the cost well over $150,000 and well over what the Main Street is already doing it for. As for how long it would take, my guess is several years just to get it semi-functional, assuming they can get in place all the complex coordination with the many other players involved and the volunteer support that will be required for it to work. City Manager Kutney also stated, but I don’t think it registered, that his plan, as presented, was only about one third (!) of what it would actually take to accomplish its stated goals. So, if the estimate for the effort described is roughly $150,000, is the total cost going to be three times that amount? It’ll be interesting to see what he comes up with.

So, is all lost?

Hopefully not. The city’s budget isn't finalized until September and even if it is, City Council can amend it later, but if it’s after September 30 the process becomes more complicated. Once Manager Kutney puts the cost together for his new Economic Development Office, working with Brooksville Main Street instead should become a more acceptable option. If there’s a chance to change at least one vote before then, we need to try, and there may be such a chance this coming Monday, August 3. See “Alert” Below.


If you’re one of Brooksville’s growing number of concerned businesses, residents, or property owners who believe and love our city and want your voice to be heard and have an impact, now is the time to let City Council know your feelings. You can do so by writing to each of the City Council members at the email addresses shown below, but you need to do it today (7/31). Natalie Kahler, Brooksville Main Street’s Executive Director, will be making its quarterly report to the Council this Monday, Aug 3. You can request your email to the Council to be verbally read into the record. Having your email read into the record by the City Clerk would be a great way have your voice heard, guaranteed! Just make sure it can be read in less than three minutes. Those of you who are in other parts of the county but love the city and many of the Main Street events it has held hopefully will write in as well.


Let there be no mistake. For the City of Brooksville to truly become the best city it can be and achieve what is clearly possible, there needs to be a strong interaction of sincere belief, appreciation, and support for the mutual roles that city government and the city’s community each must successfully carry out in unison. The Brooksville Vision Foundation and Brooksville Main Street believes it will happen and looks forward to having a strong and effective partnership with the city one day soon.

Council member email addresses:

Stay tuned …

The Voice of Brooksville Main Street

BMS ED Response to Monday Night's City Council Vote


Obviously we're disappointed.  To say less would be disingenuous as well as demeaning to those of you who've joined our movement and spent your time, talent, and treasure alongside us.

We believed our successes brought about by so many brilliant members of our community would mean our city would believe with us and continue their partnership. It didn't happen.

But be assured we are not going anywhere.

Five people hold the pursestrings to your taxes and by majority vote chose not to invest in us in 2021.  But you - the people - (residents, business owners, property owners, and lovers of Brooksville) will not lose this movement that means so much to so many.  But we will need your help - come to our Community Squad Open House on August 6 to find out  ways you can get involved!

We are grateful to our County government who has been so supportive at every step since BMS started.  Even when their budget issues last year meant they had to cut back cash funding, they've been by our side at all times, figuring out ways to contribute.  Recent examples: helping us provide outdoor seating for restaurants, lending parking spaces so restaurants could create outdoor seating, providing advice on projects and plans, administering CARES funding to our businesses, providing beautiful and inexpensive office space with County Tourism so we can further collaborate, and saying 'yes' to a new mural that will foster love for the arts in our children.  They see the vision and are helping make it happen and we couldn't be more honored by their support.

So now what?

Will we need to make adjustments to our plan after last night's City Council vote? Yes.  Will our progress timeline be impeded?  Most likely.  But does our end goal remain the same?  Yes.  We are still committed to making Brooksville its best version of itself and making it somewhere people of all ages and walks of life want to call home.  We will win this battle for the heart and prosperity of our community. It's a battle we the people cannot afford to lose.

Natalie Kahler
Executive Director
Brooksville Main Street

Click here to get to our Open House event page:

An Open Letter to Brooksville City Council

July 7, 2020

City of Brooksville City Council
201 Howell Avenue
Brooksville, FL 34601

RE: Beautification Board/ BMS

Dear Council Members:

First off, I’d like to say thank you for my appointment to the City’s Beautification Board during last Monday evening’s City Council meeting. I feel strongly that I should support the City I live in by volunteering, so I submitted the application not long after we purchased a historic house in downtown Brooksville earlier this year. While we have operated a business in Brooksville for many years, we decided it was finally time to relocate our residence here as well and are quite happy with the move.

I will say that nearly everyone we talk to asks why we would leave Hernando Beach to live in downtown Brooksville. While being on the water was lovely and it was exciting every time a dolphin swam by, there was no town center, and not enough vibrancy nor character to feel a true connection to the neighborhood in HB. In Brooksville, there are things to do, places to go and friends to bump into at every turn. I try to walk downtown most evenings for exercise and nearly always see someone to wave to. I love that sense of community. That is especially important to me as we socially distance so much these days.

That said, I really was surprised to have opposition to my offer to volunteer, particularly from people that have never met me. As stated, I have a strong architecture and historic preservation background and thought I would be a natural fit for the Beautification Committee, much as I have been for the Brooksville Main Street Design Committee. And as both groups have similar missions, I can not for the life of me think how there could be a conflict of interest. The mistrust of the Brooksville Main Street program comes from those not involved in the program and who don’t seem interested in making an effort to learn more. The program enjoys great support from many business owners and residents who understand what it does and how it impacts the City.  Local merchants will tell you that the people that attend Main Street events and activities do return to downtown and shop and eat as a result. The optimism then results in business and building owners wanting to invest in their properties as well. 

Additionally, I was flabbergasted to be accused of trying to make a profit off the City for putting my licensed contracting company on an application for installing pole banner signs, when in actuality I planned to donate my services for free. This speculation, which went on for a bit in a public forum without my ability to respond, is very troublesome, particularly from our elected leaders. It is hard to not take offense to implications such as these, both towards me and others who are donating their time to the Brooksville Main Street program and in extension, to the City. 

I can assure you that I, and the many others I have met who volunteer their time for Brooksville Main Street do not have any nefarious intentions. What I see from those involved is a desire for the City to become its best version of itself so people can enjoy downtown, whether it be shopping, events, or having wonderful places for guests to stay. If all goes as hoped, Brooksville will benefit from an increased tax base, lifting the whole City up, and the increased revenue that benefits the City will come from visitors rather than from residents. 

Brooksville has such unrealized assets and is the only historic downtown in Hernando County -  the potential here is just waiting to be discovered. The investment that has been made here over more than a century is substantial in the construction of roads, utility lines, buildings, sidewalks, landscaping and so much more. That investment has resulted in a quaint downtown and attracted some wonderful people, many of whom have invested in downtown businesses. Continuing the already substantial investment in Brooksville through the revitalization program of the Main Street Program makes so much sense and leverages so much return for a relatively small investment. Turning your back on Main Street is turning your back on Brooksville in my opinion.

As I mentioned above, the goals of the City, whether it be through the Beautification Board or CRA or other City program should be very much in line with the goals of Main Street. Having us all working together could result in great things for Brooksville, and I would welcome a conversation with any Council members regarding my motivations and thoughts. Alternately, you are welcome to talk to one of the other volunteers, or sit in on committee meetings so you have first hand experience with how things work. 


Jo-Anne Peck
Design Committee Chair, BMS

The meeting referenced in this letter can be seen at:

Biting the Hand that Feeds Them

You know something? There’s a difference between being outspoken because you’re a bully and being outspoken because you’re being bullied.

And I guess my last post has some at City Hall feeling that my outspokenness was an attempt by Brooksville Main Street to bully them. Comments at their last council meeting suggested it was akin to BMS biting the hand that feeds it. Well, that’s simply not the case. Instead, BMS is working very hard to increase and expand the hands that actually feed the city, by supporting growth of existing businesses and bringing in new ones which will bring added revenues to the city. Ultimately, these new revenues will far exceed its current monetary support of BMS.

Mostly through the hard work of unpaid volunteers, the truth is, Brooksville Main Street is doing everything it can to help City Council achieve what it and the City Council should mutually want, i.e., a vibrant, economically thriving community of historical significance worth preserving, and where living, working and raising children is a positive and safe experience.

But given the ongoing negativity and somewhat inexplicable animus toward BMS, what would you do? It has been made irrefutably clear by at least one City Council member that Brooksville Main Street should not be supported in any way by city government and has even introduced motions to that effect. This, despite significant and growing support from the business community for the program.

Look, here’s the bottom line. Brooksville Main Street has absolutely no desire to be at odds with City Council and will continue to be as cooperative as it can even in the face of adversity no matter where it comes from, including Covid-19. BMS has no choice. The community of Brooksville has no other organization with a program that includes two full time employees and exists exclusively to serve the community’s interests. To put it succinctly, finding itself at odds with City Council in any way, does not serve the community’s interests.

However, I also believe there’s a responsibility in there somewhere to step up and speak out when it’s appropriate. Like I said in my first post, if kudos are deserved we’ll give them, but if not, we won’t, and we will say why we won’t as honestly as we can and as frankly as we need to.

So, along that line, I’d like to offer a round of thanks and sincere appreciation for the council’s 4 to 1 vote approving Jo-Anne Peck to the City’s Beautification Board. Ms. Peck is well suited for the task as she has the educational background, imagination, energy, and a positive spirit that will serve the board well. Those voting in support of Ms. Peck were Mayor Joe Bernardini, Vice Mayor Pat Brayton and Council Members Bill Kemerer and Robert Battista. Council Member Betty Erhard voted against the appointment because she claimed Ms. Peck’s membership on the Brooksville Vision Foundation Board represented some kind of “conflict of interest,” despite being advised by the City Attorney that it wasn’t. (Her animus toward BMS seems endless. We cannot but wonder what’s really behind it. It is hurting the city).

I also want to thank City Manager, Mark Kutney, for attending a recent meeting of the Brooksville Vision Foundation which oversees the Brooksville Main Street program. I’ve never held an elected position but I’ve worked with many city councils and county commissions throughout my career. Elected officials particularly at the local level do not have an easy task. Nor do the administrators who work for them. It is painfully true that there is simply no way to make “all the people happy all the time,” as the saying goes. So, I commend Mr. Kutney for his service and professionalism in the face of that truth.

Finally, based upon comments made at the Council’s last meeting, I think it’s important to clarify that Natalie Kahler is not the writer behind the “Voice of Main Street.” These posts are written as a collaborative effort among a number of people who are extremely interested in the future of the City of Brooksville and, consequently, the “Voice” represents the voice of many committed individuals, not just one. To conclude Natalie is the author is incorrect and she should therefore not have to bear the burden of being accused of such.

… Stay tuned.
The Voice of Brooksville Main Street

P.S. Ms. Peck's application to the Beautification Board and Brooksville Main Street's request to install Welcome to Brooksville banners and Florida Mermaid Trail way finding signage are all discussed at the July 6, 2020 City Council meeting:

Sincere and Special Thanks to the Council Members Who Supported Us … but geeze

Here’s a rundown on the “virtual” meeting held by the Brooksville City Council Monday evening (5/18). I told you we wouldn’t sugar coat it.


Well, Monday night (5/18) the Brooksville City Council graciously approved funding for the second quarter (Jan - Mar) of its grant to the Brooksville Main Street program. The amount was $11,250, less $678.82 to cover other costs incurred by the city on behalf of the program. For that, all those associated with Brooksville’s Main Street program and the growing number of folks who are stepping up to support it are absolutely and sincerely grateful. We operate on a shoestring. Every penny counts. And every penny is spent to make the City of Brooksville a long-term vibrant and economically strong place to live work and recreate. 

Gracious thanks go to the four Council members who, after more than three hours of discussing the program and whether they should issue the check, finally voted for it. For the record those voting favorably were Bill Kemerer, Mayor Joe Bernardini, Vice-Mayor Pat Brayton, and, grudgingly, Robert Battista.

Yes, I said three hours. Did it need to take so long? No. So, why did it? Here’s a quick look from the “virtual” balcony seats. It wasn’t a pretty picture.

Thirty minutes for getting the “virtual meeting” technology working and the Council members to find the button that mutes their mikes off and on. Thirty minutes of reading about two dozen letters into the record from folks who support Brooksville Main Street, and one email and three texted messages from those who didn’t. Fifteen minutes for Brooksville Main Street to make its required report detailing to whom and how the city’s funds had been spent over the last month (which they cut short because it was running over the 15 minutes allotted - the irony of which can’t be missed given the hours of conversation and hand-wringing about lack of transparency that followed). Then, several more hours of what can only be called an inquisition of the Main Street program.

Though eventually approved 4 to 1, the atmosphere, even if they were together only digitally, was not comfortable for anyone. Certainly not for Main Street and, rather obviously, not for the Council members.  

The level of angst in the checkerboard of faces on the computer screen was palpable, presumably in anticipation of the anticipated and well-known positions of Ms. Erhard. She never misses an opportunity to suggest, without substantiation, that none of the people associated with the Brooksville Main Street program or those who oversee it, the Board of Directors of the Brooksville Vision Foundation, can be trusted. And while she seems overly eager to denigrate the character of the Executive Director and the integrity of all involved as a means to destroy the only functioning, organized effort to bring new businesses and economic stability to the city, she has no better alternative to offer.

Because it was mentioned, if the city is in fact contemplating adding an economic development arm to its staff which would be at least on a par with Main Street, it’ll be faced with having to pay for much of what Main Street is already accomplishing through the help of hundreds of hours of unpaid volunteers and two paid professional staff that spend 100% of their time working toward Brooksville’s much needed revitalization. This is not to say I’m against the city doing it, so it shouldn’t be taken as such. Just sayin’…

In addition, much of the “discussion” was Mr. Battista’s somewhat rambling diatribe about what he clearly believes is the city’s future which (for lack of a better way to put it) consists of only stagnancy and doom, and money spent trying to do anything about it is just wasting it as well as any effort put into it.

I’m not exaggerating here. 

Fortunately, a clearer-minded majority prevailed on a series of motions initiated by Ms. Erhard that would: 1) withdraw the city from the original agreement and abandon Brooksville Main Street program altogether; 2) add additional “transparency” requirements, which brought comments from other Council members saying would be impossible for Main Street to meet, and that they were satisfied with the transparency of the current requirements, and; 3) reject granting the quarterly funds the city had formerly contracted to grant. This prompted comments that Brooksville Main Street had clearly met the contract’s requirements and denial of payment might not be found justifiable.

One point that all fairly acknowledged is that, with the disruption wrought by Covid-19 upon everyone’s lives and incomes in both the public and private sectors, programs and projects are going to be impacted. This is a reality no one can deny and tough decisions lie ahead.

Nevertheless, it needs to be said why I believe Mr. Battista’s thinking about the future of Brooksville is dead wrong. Anyone interested in this conversation should read the article listed at this link: After the Lockdown, New Opportunities for Downtown Shopping Districts

The article suggests,

These are just some of the ideas why I must believe Mr. Battista is wrong. There are many more.

And further, to hear an elected city official suggest his city has no future beyond the failed businesses and economic malaise of the past, that there is “no commercial frontage,” “not enough inventory”, “there is no draw,” “people see the town but they don’t comeback,” it has “hills,” it’s “too dispersed,” residents are “intermixed,” etc., is , frankly, not the kind of thinking any current business or restaurant wants to hear. Not to mention the awful message it could be sending to potential businesses, e.g., “Forget it! Brooksville’s done. No opportunities here.”

Elected leaders are supposed to fight for and support belief and action that will benefit their constituents, not say and act against those interests. I hope Mr. Battista’s dismal view of Brooksville’s future will change, and with the help of Brooksville Main Street and the many businesses and citizens who love Brooksville and hear about it, I believe it will.

Despite Ms. Erhard’s determination to kill Main Street’s current determined efforts to revitalize our City’s economy, to protect and cherish its historic architectural heritage, and make Brooksville a destination community where people will visit and return again and again to its stores and restaurants, please know this: Brooksville Main Street has hope and a determination that will never be extinguished. 

We believe in Brooksville.

Stay tuned …

The Voice of Brooksville Main Street

For anyone interested in watching the meeting for yourself, you can see it at

The Voice of Brooksville Main Street: An Introduction

You’re probably a bit surprised receiving this email from Brooksville Main Street so let me say up front, defenders of Brooksville Main Street have decided it needs to speak up. Yes, we want you to know what we’re all about. That’s important. But we also think you deserve to be informed of other matters that may be difficult or complicated but central to your interest in revitalizing your city.

And, by creating a voice for Brooksville Main Street, we hope we are also giving you a voice because we want that voice to reflect what we’re hearing from you and for you to engage some of the challenges we face with us. The only reason we do this is for you, the residents, the businesses, and the property owners of the City. We know these are challenging times. We’re not going to sugar coat it.

Okay, so, this is the first post of a new Blog we’re calling The Voice of Brooksville Main Street, and I’m betting you’re going to want follow what we’ll be talking about over the coming months because, if kudos are deserved we’ll give them, but if not, we won’t, and we’re going to be saying why as honestly as we can and as frankly as necessary.

Let me ask you this. If you entered a contract with someone to provide a service and a month later there were unintended scheduling problems, wouldn’t you think there’s a good chance both parties would be interested in fixing the problem? Yes, I do too. If the agreement was entered into in good faith, it would be a piece of cake.

Well, let me share a situation that’s unfolding right now that doesn’t seem to be working out that way.

Brooksville Main Street is a new organization with a number of very important revitalization goals for the City that were worked out with our City Council and County Commissioners in 2016 which then agreed to help fund some of its start-up costs. The agreement was made between each government and the Brooksville Vision Foundation, a non-profit organization consisting primarily of downtown business and property owners. In exchange for the funding, the Vision Foundation agreed to work toward getting the City designated a Main Street Community per guidelines of the nationally recognized, Main Street America model, which describes itself as:

A Grassroots Network
Made up of small towns, mid-sized communities, and urban commercial districts, the thousands of organizations, individuals, volunteers, and local leaders that make up Main Street America represent the broad diversity that makes this country so unique. Working together, the Main Street America Network helps to breathe new life into the places people call home.

It also claims:

Dollar for dollar, Main Street has proven itself to be one of the most impactful cost-effective community revitalization models in the country.

Last fall, the City and Brooksville Vision Foundation created an agreement to more fully detail City  expectations.  After several months, both realized adjustments needed to be made to the agreement, so in March 2020, the City and the Brooksville Vision Foundation worked out the problems and amendments to the offending language of the agreement was officially approved by both parties.

At a meeting the following month (April), however, a member of the Council decided the negotiated fix was not satisfactory, so the City Council unilaterally decided to amend the agreement and - again unilaterally – has scheduled approval of those amendments Monday night. Yes, this Monday night. 

The Brooksville Vision Foundation found out about these latest changes only yesterday, Thursday, May 14, when the city published its agenda for the meeting. This has left the Brooksville Vision Foundation Board no opportunity to meet and assess the changes to determine if they are acceptable or to be able to propose alternate language, and the apparent expectation is that the Brooksville Vision Foundation representative will have to negotiate “on the fly” without any input from its staff, lawyer or the Board of Directors.

I’ll let you decide what kind of signal this sends to any party to any agreement where this is the treatment one gives to the other, but I’ll wager it doesn’t involve good faith cooperation and positive vibes, the bedrock of any successful partnership.

The very purpose of any agreement is to set forth mutually agreed upon terms under which the parties agree to work to achieve mutually agreed upon goals through a specified period. It is simply not acceptable for a partner to unilaterally change the dance in the middle of a song.  

The city’s rationale for all this is that it wants to assure the public’s funds it has agreed to provide are being spent properly, so more transparency is required, i.e., more than what was originally asked for and agreed to, which was substantial. Therefore, it is now demanding copies of all canceled checks for every dollar spent of public money. 

Someone please help me here. How is this more transparent than the multiple reports and continuous updates we have already agreed to provide the city every quarter? We have already agreed to provide at the first available meeting after submittal of request for payment a presentation which “shall inform the public and the City Council of the activities where the funds will or have been used.” As well as a monthly Profit and Loss Statement, a Year to Date Summary and an updated balance sheet for each previous month. 

Why is there now a demand for copies of all canceled checks? If there had been an opportunity to discuss a specific concern, maybe it could have been addressed in a forthright manner. What is the issue that a simple audit might address at the appropriate time if there is such concern about the honesty of the program’s leaders and staff? There simply is no basis or justification for any such innuendo. If there is, let there be factual data brought forward to support it. Until then, let there be a renewed spirit of cooperation and strength that will surely be needed in the days ahead as the city faces the impacts of a global pandemic.

Another new amendment I’ve learned they’re looking at is this sentence they want to add:

“…the City Council and the Foundation may discuss and agree to identify specific expectations for achievement during the following quarter.”

Wait a minute. Doesn’t this seem obvious? An agreement doesn’t have to include this language for it to happen if both parties wish it to happen. The old saying, “It goes without saying,” certainly applies here. So, what’s the REAL purpose?

Is it beginning to feel like there’s another agenda here? Is the city really behind the Main Street Program as it says, or not? It’s said the proof is in the pudding. Hopefully, we’ll soon see it is. Completely and in good faith. But the question is being asked.

… Stay tuned

The Voice of Brooksville Main Street